Research
Critical Communication Inquiry
Animal Welfare
Animal Rights
Critical Animal Studies
Animal Advocacy
Critical Practice
Process Philosophy
Middle Way
National Communication Association
Human Animal Relations
Relational Process Approach
Nonhuman Animal, Nonhuman Animals
Performative Cultural Politics
Co Founder
Qualitiative Communication Research
Human Studies
Editorial Assistant
Educational Practice
Radical Interventions
Express Authorization
Emerging Paradigm
Humanist Histories
Million Professionals
Commercial Use
Multiple Disciplines
Dynamic Field
Scholar Presentation
Response Essay
Critical Scholars
Process Oriented Perspective
Productive Politics
Critical Work
Fundamental Tenets
Critical Communication Knowledge
Brief Analysis
Final Section
Critical Communication Work
Communication Scholarship
Human Animal Encounter
Critical Consideration
Cultural Imperialism
Centered Dialogue
Compassionate Culture
Ethical Considerations
Critics Discourse
Philosophical Perspective
Concerned Critics
Radical Environmental Activism
Critical Pedagogy Research
Critical Analysis
Body Politic
Experiential Time
Critical Education, Critical Educators
Critical Cultural Studies
Human Thinking
Moral Personality
Future Perspective
Essential Possibilities
Ontological Meaning
International Association
Question Normative Sexed
Non Human Animals
Sexual Identities
Industry Practices
Top Four
Human Freedom
Critical Rhetoric
Post Critical Challenges
Media Representations
Real Constructs
Material Political Change
Privilege Student
Political Power
Gendered Performances
Scholarly Conversations
Essential Communicative Mode
Non Use
Critical Alternatives
Uniquely Situated Performative Actualization
Organized Panel
Performative Activism
Corporate Strategies
Environmental Communication Division
Western States
Public Sphere
Seven Presenters
Central Focus
Ethical Standards
One Teacher
Human Species
Critical Scholarship
Post Critical Move
Political Participation
Widespread Use
Human Subjectivity
Modern Industrial Methods
Serious Concerns
Subsequent Strategies
Institutional Politics
Particular Processes
Week Period
Industrial Processes
News Stories
Tremendous Amount
Environmental Damage
Fluid Relationships
Panel Chair
Four Presenters
Mass Communication Division
Central States
Basic Critical
Communication Classroom
Basic Communication Course
Critical Dialogue
National Speakers
Association Scholarship
American River
Case Study Analysis
List of Publications (356)
In 1989
356
The case study analysis presented in this essay suggests that student-centered dialogue is not the only--nor is it an essentialmeans for helping students develop a sense of critical consciousness. Utilizing Raymie McKerrow's (1989) theory of critical rhetoric to analyze the strategies of one teacher, I focus on how the development of critical consciousness is possible without a central focus on student-centered dialogue.
Found on Publication Page
355
The case study analysis presented in this essay suggests that student-centered dialogue is not the only--nor is it an essentialmeans for helping students develop a sense of critical consciousness. Utilizing Raymie McKerrow's (1989) theory of critical rhetoric to analyze the strategies of one teacher, I focus on how the development of critical consciousness is possible without a central focus on student-centered dialogue.
Found on Publication Page
354
The case study analysis presented in this essay suggests that student-centered dialogue is not the only--nor is it an essentialmeans for helping students develop a sense of critical consciousness. Utilizing Raymie McKerrow's (1989) theory of critical rhetoric to analyze the strategies of one teacher, I focus on how the development of critical consciousness is possible without a central focus on student-centered dialogue.
Found on Publication Page
353
The case study analysis presented in this essay suggests that student-centered dialogue is not the only--nor is it an essentialmeans for helping students develop a sense of critical consciousness. Utilizing Raymie McKerrow's (1989) theory of critical rhetoric to analyze the strategies of one teacher, I focus on how the development of critical consciousness is possible without a central focus on student-centered dialogue.
Found on Publication Page
352
The case study analysis presented in this essay suggests that student-centered dialogue is not the only--nor is it an essentialmeans for helping students develop a sense of critical consciousness. Utilizing Raymie McKerrow's (1989) theory of critical rhetoric to analyze the strategies of one teacher, I focus on how the development of critical consciousness is possible without a central focus on student-centered dialogue.
Found on Publication Page
351
The case study analysis presented in this essay suggests that student-centered dialogue is not the only--nor is it an essentialmeans for helping students develop a sense of critical consciousness. Utilizing Raymie McKerrow's (1989) theory of critical rhetoric to analyze the strategies of one teacher, I focus on how the development of critical consciousness is possible without a central focus on student-centered dialogue.
Found on Publication Page
350
The case study analysis presented in this essay suggests that student-centered dialogue is not the only--nor is it an essentialmeans for helping students develop a sense of critical consciousness. Utilizing Raymie McKerrow's (1989) theory of critical rhetoric to analyze the strategies of one teacher, I focus on how the development of critical consciousness is possible without a central focus on student-centered dialogue.
Found on Publication Page
349
The case study analysis presented in this essay suggests that student-centered dialogue is not the only--nor is it an essentialmeans for helping students develop a sense of critical consciousness. Utilizing Raymie McKerrow's (1989) theory of critical rhetoric to analyze the strategies of one teacher, I focus on how the development of critical consciousness is possible without a central focus on student-centered dialogue.
Found on Publication Page
348
The case study analysis presented in this essay suggests that student-centered dialogue is not the only--nor is it an essentialmeans for helping students develop a sense of critical consciousness. Utilizing Raymie McKerrow's (1989) theory of critical rhetoric to analyze the strategies of one teacher, I focus on how the development of critical consciousness is possible without a central focus on student-centered dialogue.
Found on Publication Page
347
The case study analysis presented in this essay suggests that student-centered dialogue is not the only--nor is it an essentialmeans for helping students develop a sense of critical consciousness. Utilizing Raymie McKerrow's (1989) theory of critical rhetoric to analyze the strategies of one teacher, I focus on how the development of critical consciousness is possible without a central focus on student-centered dialogue.
Found on Publication Page
346
The case study analysis presented in this essay suggests that student-centered dialogue is not the only--nor is it an essentialmeans for helping students develop a sense of critical consciousness. Utilizing Raymie McKerrow's (1989) theory of critical rhetoric to analyze the strategies of one teacher, I focus on how the development of critical consciousness is possible without a central focus on student-centered dialogue.
Found on Publication Page
345
The case study analysis presented in this essay suggests that student-centered dialogue is not the only--nor is it an essentialmeans for helping students develop a sense of critical consciousness. Utilizing Raymie McKerrow's (1989) theory of critical rhetoric to analyze the strategies of one teacher, I focus on how the development of critical consciousness is possible without a central focus on student-centered dialogue.
Found on Publication Page
344
The case study analysis presented in this essay suggests that student-centered dialogue is not the only--nor is it an essentialmeans for helping students develop a sense of critical consciousness. Utilizing Raymie McKerrow's (1989) theory of critical rhetoric to analyze the strategies of one teacher, I focus on how the development of critical consciousness is possible without a central focus on student-centered dialogue.
Found on Publication Page
343
The case study analysis presented in this essay suggests that student-centered dialogue is not the only--nor is it an essentialmeans for helping students develop a sense of critical consciousness. Utilizing Raymie McKerrow's (1989) theory of critical rhetoric to analyze the strategies of one teacher, I focus on how the development of critical consciousness is possible without a central focus on student-centered dialogue.
Found on Publication Page
342
The case study analysis presented in this essay suggests that student-centered dialogue is not the only--nor is it an essentialmeans for helping students develop a sense of critical consciousness. Utilizing Raymie McKerrow's (1989) theory of critical rhetoric to analyze the strategies of one teacher, I focus on how the development of critical consciousness is possible without a central focus on student-centered dialogue.
Found on Publication Page
341
The case study analysis presented in this essay suggests that student-centered dialogue is not the only--nor is it an essentialmeans for helping students develop a sense of critical consciousness. Utilizing Raymie McKerrow's (1989) theory of critical rhetoric to analyze the strategies of one teacher, I focus on how the development of critical consciousness is possible without a central focus on student-centered dialogue.
Found on Publication Page
340
The case study analysis presented in this essay suggests that student-centered dialogue is not the only--nor is it an essentialmeans for helping students develop a sense of critical consciousness. Utilizing Raymie McKerrow's (1989) theory of critical rhetoric to analyze the strategies of one teacher, I focus on how the development of critical consciousness is possible without a central focus on student-centered dialogue.
Found on Publication Page
339
The case study analysis presented in this essay suggests that student-centered dialogue is not the only--nor is it an essentialmeans for helping students develop a sense of critical consciousness. Utilizing Raymie McKerrow's (1989) theory of critical rhetoric to analyze the strategies of one teacher, I focus on how the development of critical consciousness is possible without a central focus on student-centered dialogue.
Found on Publication Page
338
The case study analysis presented in this essay suggests that student-centered dialogue is not the only--nor is it an essentialmeans for helping students develop a sense of critical consciousness. Utilizing Raymie McKerrow's (1989) theory of critical rhetoric to analyze the strategies of one teacher, I focus on how the development of critical consciousness is possible without a central focus on student-centered dialogue.
Found on Publication Page
337
The case study analysis presented in this essay suggests that student-centered dialogue is not the only--nor is it an essentialmeans for helping students develop a sense of critical consciousness. Utilizing Raymie McKerrow's (1989) theory of critical rhetoric to analyze the strategies of one teacher, I focus on how the development of critical consciousness is possible without a central focus on student-centered dialogue.
Found on Publication Page
336
The case study analysis presented in this essay suggests that student-centered dialogue is not the only--nor is it an essentialmeans for helping students develop a sense of critical consciousness. Utilizing Raymie McKerrow's (1989) theory of critical rhetoric to analyze the strategies of one teacher, I focus on how the development of critical consciousness is possible without a central focus on student-centered dialogue.
Found on Publication Page
335
The case study analysis presented in this essay suggests that student-centered dialogue is not the only--nor is it an essentialmeans for helping students develop a sense of critical consciousness. Utilizing Raymie McKerrow's (1989) theory of critical rhetoric to analyze the strategies of one teacher, I focus on how the development of critical consciousness is possible without a central focus on student-centered dialogue.
Found on Publication Page
334
The case study analysis presented in this essay suggests that student-centered dialogue is not the only--nor is it an essentialmeans for helping students develop a sense of critical consciousness. Utilizing Raymie McKerrow's (1989) theory of critical rhetoric to analyze the strategies of one teacher, I focus on how the development of critical consciousness is possible without a central focus on student-centered dialogue.
Found on Publication Page
333
The case study analysis presented in this essay suggests that student-centered dialogue is not the only--nor is it an essentialmeans for helping students develop a sense of critical consciousness. Utilizing Raymie McKerrow's (1989) theory of critical rhetoric to analyze the strategies of one teacher, I focus on how the development of critical consciousness is possible without a central focus on student-centered dialogue.
Found on Publication Page
332
The case study analysis presented in this essay suggests that student-centered dialogue is not the only--nor is it an essentialmeans for helping students develop a sense of critical consciousness. Utilizing Raymie McKerrow's (1989) theory of critical rhetoric to analyze the strategies of one teacher, I focus on how the development of critical consciousness is possible without a central focus on student-centered dialogue.
Found on Publication Page
331
The case study analysis presented in this essay suggests that student-centered dialogue is not the only--nor is it an essentialmeans for helping students develop a sense of critical consciousness. Utilizing Raymie McKerrow's (1989) theory of critical rhetoric to analyze the strategies of one teacher, I focus on how the development of critical consciousness is possible without a central focus on student-centered dialogue.
Found on Publication Page
330
The case study analysis presented in this essay suggests that student-centered dialogue is not the only--nor is it an essentialmeans for helping students develop a sense of critical consciousness. Utilizing Raymie McKerrow's (1989) theory of critical rhetoric to analyze the strategies of one teacher, I focus on how the development of critical consciousness is possible without a central focus on student-centered dialogue.
Found on Publication Page
329
The case study analysis presented in this essay suggests that student-centered dialogue is not the only--nor is it an essentialmeans for helping students develop a sense of critical consciousness. Utilizing Raymie McKerrow's (1989) theory of critical rhetoric to analyze the strategies of one teacher, I focus on how the development of critical consciousness is possible without a central focus on student-centered dialogue.
Found on Publication Page
328
The case study analysis presented in this essay suggests that student-centered dialogue is not the only--nor is it an essentialmeans for helping students develop a sense of critical consciousness. Utilizing Raymie McKerrow's (1989) theory of critical rhetoric to analyze the strategies of one teacher, I focus on how the development of critical consciousness is possible without a central focus on student-centered dialogue.
Found on Publication Page
327
The case study analysis presented in this essay suggests that student-centered dialogue is not the only--nor is it an essentialmeans for helping students develop a sense of critical consciousness. Utilizing Raymie McKerrow's (1989) theory of critical rhetoric to analyze the strategies of one teacher, I focus on how the development of critical consciousness is possible without a central focus on student-centered dialogue.
Found on Publication Page
326
The case study analysis presented in this essay suggests that student-centered dialogue is not the only--nor is it an essentialmeans for helping students develop a sense of critical consciousness. Utilizing Raymie McKerrow's (1989) theory of critical rhetoric to analyze the strategies of one teacher, I focus on how the development of critical consciousness is possible without a central focus on student-centered dialogue.
Found on Publication Page
325
The case study analysis presented in this essay suggests that student-centered dialogue is not the only--nor is it an essentialmeans for helping students develop a sense of critical consciousness. Utilizing Raymie McKerrow's (1989) theory of critical rhetoric to analyze the strategies of one teacher, I focus on how the development of critical consciousness is possible without a central focus on student-centered dialogue.
Found on Publication Page
324
The case study analysis presented in this essay suggests that student-centered dialogue is not the only--nor is it an essentialmeans for helping students develop a sense of critical consciousness. Utilizing Raymie McKerrow's (1989) theory of critical rhetoric to analyze the strategies of one teacher, I focus on how the development of critical consciousness is possible without a central focus on student-centered dialogue.
Found on Publication Page
323
The case study analysis presented in this essay suggests that student-centered dialogue is not the only--nor is it an essentialmeans for helping students develop a sense of critical consciousness. Utilizing Raymie McKerrow's (1989) theory of critical rhetoric to analyze the strategies of one teacher, I focus on how the development of critical consciousness is possible without a central focus on student-centered dialogue.
Found on Publication Page
322
The case study analysis presented in this essay suggests that student-centered dialogue is not the only--nor is it an essentialmeans for helping students develop a sense of critical consciousness. Utilizing Raymie McKerrow's (1989) theory of critical rhetoric to analyze the strategies of one teacher, I focus on how the development of critical consciousness is possible without a central focus on student-centered dialogue.
Found on Publication Page
In 283
321
Sherovers emphasis on futurity as the sine qua non of moral personality follows both Kant and Heideggers focus on elucidating the essential possibilities of human thinking and experiencing . Sherover , however , picks up where Kant and Heidegger left offshifting Kants focus on things to a focus on persons , and moving beyond Heideggers focus on the structure of experiential time toward an understanding of time as experienced . For Sherover , then , a primacy of the future perspective means taking seriously the primacy of persons and facing , in that respect , the question of the ontological meaning of possibility-as-such -LRB- HKT ,
Found on Publication Page
320
Sherovers emphasis on futurity as the sine qua non of moral personality follows both Kant and Heideggers focus on elucidating the essential possibilities of human thinking and experiencing . Sherover , however , picks up where Kant and Heidegger left offshifting Kants focus on things to a focus on persons , and moving beyond Heideggers focus on the structure of experiential time toward an understanding of time as experienced . For Sherover , then , a primacy of the future perspective means taking seriously the primacy of persons and facing , in that respect , the question of the ontological meaning of possibility-as-such -LRB- HKT ,
Found on Publication Page
319
Sherovers emphasis on futurity as the sine qua non of moral personality follows both Kant and Heideggers focus on elucidating the essential possibilities of human thinking and experiencing . Sherover , however , picks up where Kant and Heidegger left offshifting Kants focus on things to a focus on persons , and moving beyond Heideggers focus on the structure of experiential time toward an understanding of time as experienced . For Sherover , then , a primacy of the future perspective means taking seriously the primacy of persons and facing , in that respect , the question of the ontological meaning of possibility-as-such -LRB- HKT ,
Found on Publication Page
318
Sherovers emphasis on futurity as the sine qua non of moral personality follows both Kant and Heideggers focus on elucidating the essential possibilities of human thinking and experiencing . Sherover , however , picks up where Kant and Heidegger left offshifting Kants focus on things to a focus on persons , and moving beyond Heideggers focus on the structure of experiential time toward an understanding of time as experienced . For Sherover , then , a primacy of the future perspective means taking seriously the primacy of persons and facing , in that respect , the question of the ontological meaning of possibility-as-such -LRB- HKT ,
Found on Publication Page
317
Sherovers emphasis on futurity as the sine qua non of moral personality follows both Kant and Heideggers focus on elucidating the essential possibilities of human thinking and experiencing . Sherover , however , picks up where Kant and Heidegger left offshifting Kants focus on things to a focus on persons , and moving beyond Heideggers focus on the structure of experiential time toward an understanding of time as experienced . For Sherover , then , a primacy of the future perspective means taking seriously the primacy of persons and facing , in that respect , the question of the ontological meaning of possibility-as-such -LRB- HKT ,
Found on Publication Page
316
Sherovers emphasis on futurity as the sine qua non of moral personality follows both Kant and Heideggers focus on elucidating the essential possibilities of human thinking and experiencing . Sherover , however , picks up where Kant and Heidegger left offshifting Kants focus on things to a focus on persons , and moving beyond Heideggers focus on the structure of experiential time toward an understanding of time as experienced . For Sherover , then , a primacy of the future perspective means taking seriously the primacy of persons and facing , in that respect , the question of the ontological meaning of possibility-as-such -LRB- HKT ,
Found on Publication Page
315
Sherovers emphasis on futurity as the sine qua non of moral personality follows both Kant and Heideggers focus on elucidating the essential possibilities of human thinking and experiencing . Sherover , however , picks up where Kant and Heidegger left offshifting Kants focus on things to a focus on persons , and moving beyond Heideggers focus on the structure of experiential time toward an understanding of time as experienced . For Sherover , then , a primacy of the future perspective means taking seriously the primacy of persons and facing , in that respect , the question of the ontological meaning of possibility-as-such -LRB- HKT ,
Found on Publication Page
314
Sherovers emphasis on futurity as the sine qua non of moral personality follows both Kant and Heideggers focus on elucidating the essential possibilities of human thinking and experiencing . Sherover , however , picks up where Kant and Heidegger left offshifting Kants focus on things to a focus on persons , and moving beyond Heideggers focus on the structure of experiential time toward an understanding of time as experienced . For Sherover , then , a primacy of the future perspective means taking seriously the primacy of persons and facing , in that respect , the question of the ontological meaning of possibility-as-such -LRB- HKT ,
Found on Publication Page
313
Sherovers emphasis on futurity as the sine qua non of moral personality follows both Kant and Heideggers focus on elucidating the essential possibilities of human thinking and experiencing . Sherover , however , picks up where Kant and Heidegger left offshifting Kants focus on things to a focus on persons , and moving beyond Heideggers focus on the structure of experiential time toward an understanding of time as experienced . For Sherover , then , a primacy of the future perspective means taking seriously the primacy of persons and facing , in that respect , the question of the ontological meaning of possibility-as-such -LRB- HKT ,
Found on Publication Page
312
Sherovers emphasis on futurity as the sine qua non of moral personality follows both Kant and Heideggers focus on elucidating the essential possibilities of human thinking and experiencing . Sherover , however , picks up where Kant and Heidegger left offshifting Kants focus on things to a focus on persons , and moving beyond Heideggers focus on the structure of experiential time toward an understanding of time as experienced . For Sherover , then , a primacy of the future perspective means taking seriously the primacy of persons and facing , in that respect , the question of the ontological meaning of possibility-as-such -LRB- HKT ,
Found on Publication Page
311
Sherovers emphasis on futurity as the sine qua non of moral personality follows both Kant and Heideggers focus on elucidating the essential possibilities of human thinking and experiencing . Sherover , however , picks up where Kant and Heidegger left offshifting Kants focus on things to a focus on persons , and moving beyond Heideggers focus on the structure of experiential time toward an understanding of time as experienced . For Sherover , then , a primacy of the future perspective means taking seriously the primacy of persons and facing , in that respect , the question of the ontological meaning of possibility-as-such -LRB- HKT ,
Found on Publication Page
310
Sherovers emphasis on futurity as the sine qua non of moral personality follows both Kant and Heideggers focus on elucidating the essential possibilities of human thinking and experiencing . Sherover , however , picks up where Kant and Heidegger left offshifting Kants focus on things to a focus on persons , and moving beyond Heideggers focus on the structure of experiential time toward an understanding of time as experienced . For Sherover , then , a primacy of the future perspective means taking seriously the primacy of persons and facing , in that respect , the question of the ontological meaning of possibility-as-such -LRB- HKT ,
Found on Publication Page
309
Sherovers emphasis on futurity as the sine qua non of moral personality follows both Kant and Heideggers focus on elucidating the essential possibilities of human thinking and experiencing . Sherover , however , picks up where Kant and Heidegger left offshifting Kants focus on things to a focus on persons , and moving beyond Heideggers focus on the structure of experiential time toward an understanding of time as experienced . For Sherover , then , a primacy of the future perspective means taking seriously the primacy of persons and facing , in that respect , the question of the ontological meaning of possibility-as-such -LRB- HKT ,
Found on Publication Page
308
Sherovers emphasis on futurity as the sine qua non of moral personality follows both Kant and Heideggers focus on elucidating the essential possibilities of human thinking and experiencing . Sherover , however , picks up where Kant and Heidegger left offshifting Kants focus on things to a focus on persons , and moving beyond Heideggers focus on the structure of experiential time toward an understanding of time as experienced . For Sherover , then , a primacy of the future perspective means taking seriously the primacy of persons and facing , in that respect , the question of the ontological meaning of possibility-as-such -LRB- HKT ,
Found on Publication Page
307
Sherovers emphasis on futurity as the sine qua non of moral personality follows both Kant and Heideggers focus on elucidating the essential possibilities of human thinking and experiencing . Sherover , however , picks up where Kant and Heidegger left offshifting Kants focus on things to a focus on persons , and moving beyond Heideggers focus on the structure of experiential time toward an understanding of time as experienced . For Sherover , then , a primacy of the future perspective means taking seriously the primacy of persons and facing , in that respect , the question of the ontological meaning of possibility-as-such -LRB- HKT ,
Found on Publication Page
306
Sherovers emphasis on futurity as the sine qua non of moral personality follows both Kant and Heideggers focus on elucidating the essential possibilities of human thinking and experiencing . Sherover , however , picks up where Kant and Heidegger left offshifting Kants focus on things to a focus on persons , and moving beyond Heideggers focus on the structure of experiential time toward an understanding of time as experienced . For Sherover , then , a primacy of the future perspective means taking seriously the primacy of persons and facing , in that respect , the question of the ontological meaning of possibility-as-such -LRB- HKT ,
Found on Publication Page
305
Sherovers emphasis on futurity as the sine qua non of moral personality follows both Kant and Heideggers focus on elucidating the essential possibilities of human thinking and experiencing . Sherover , however , picks up where Kant and Heidegger left offshifting Kants focus on things to a focus on persons , and moving beyond Heideggers focus on the structure of experiential time toward an understanding of time as experienced . For Sherover , then , a primacy of the future perspective means taking seriously the primacy of persons and facing , in that respect , the question of the ontological meaning of possibility-as-such -LRB- HKT ,
Found on Publication Page
304
Sherovers emphasis on futurity as the sine qua non of moral personality follows both Kant and Heideggers focus on elucidating the essential possibilities of human thinking and experiencing . Sherover , however , picks up where Kant and Heidegger left offshifting Kants focus on things to a focus on persons , and moving beyond Heideggers focus on the structure of experiential time toward an understanding of time as experienced . For Sherover , then , a primacy of the future perspective means taking seriously the primacy of persons and facing , in that respect , the question of the ontological meaning of possibility-as-such -LRB- HKT ,
Found on Publication Page
303
Sherovers emphasis on futurity as the sine qua non of moral personality follows both Kant and Heideggers focus on elucidating the essential possibilities of human thinking and experiencing . Sherover , however , picks up where Kant and Heidegger left offshifting Kants focus on things to a focus on persons , and moving beyond Heideggers focus on the structure of experiential time toward an understanding of time as experienced . For Sherover , then , a primacy of the future perspective means taking seriously the primacy of persons and facing , in that respect , the question of the ontological meaning of possibility-as-such -LRB- HKT ,
Found on Publication Page
302
Sherovers emphasis on futurity as the sine qua non of moral personality follows both Kant and Heideggers focus on elucidating the essential possibilities of human thinking and experiencing . Sherover , however , picks up where Kant and Heidegger left offshifting Kants focus on things to a focus on persons , and moving beyond Heideggers focus on the structure of experiential time toward an understanding of time as experienced . For Sherover , then , a primacy of the future perspective means taking seriously the primacy of persons and facing , in that respect , the question of the ontological meaning of possibility-as-such -LRB- HKT ,
Found on Publication Page
301
Sherovers emphasis on futurity as the sine qua non of moral personality follows both Kant and Heideggers focus on elucidating the essential possibilities of human thinking and experiencing . Sherover , however , picks up where Kant and Heidegger left offshifting Kants focus on things to a focus on persons , and moving beyond Heideggers focus on the structure of experiential time toward an understanding of time as experienced . For Sherover , then , a primacy of the future perspective means taking seriously the primacy of persons and facing , in that respect , the question of the ontological meaning of possibility-as-such -LRB- HKT ,
Found on Publication Page
300
Sherovers emphasis on futurity as the sine qua non of moral personality follows both Kant and Heideggers focus on elucidating the essential possibilities of human thinking and experiencing . Sherover , however , picks up where Kant and Heidegger left offshifting Kants focus on things to a focus on persons , and moving beyond Heideggers focus on the structure of experiential time toward an understanding of time as experienced . For Sherover , then , a primacy of the future perspective means taking seriously the primacy of persons and facing , in that respect , the question of the ontological meaning of possibility-as-such -LRB- HKT ,
Found on Publication Page
299
Sherovers emphasis on futurity as the sine qua non of moral personality follows both Kant and Heideggers focus on elucidating the essential possibilities of human thinking and experiencing . Sherover , however , picks up where Kant and Heidegger left offshifting Kants focus on things to a focus on persons , and moving beyond Heideggers focus on the structure of experiential time toward an understanding of time as experienced . For Sherover , then , a primacy of the future perspective means taking seriously the primacy of persons and facing , in that respect , the question of the ontological meaning of possibility-as-such -LRB- HKT ,
Found on Publication Page
298
Sherovers emphasis on futurity as the sine qua non of moral personality follows both Kant and Heideggers focus on elucidating the essential possibilities of human thinking and experiencing . Sherover , however , picks up where Kant and Heidegger left offshifting Kants focus on things to a focus on persons , and moving beyond Heideggers focus on the structure of experiential time toward an understanding of time as experienced . For Sherover , then , a primacy of the future perspective means taking seriously the primacy of persons and facing , in that respect , the question of the ontological meaning of possibility-as-such -LRB- HKT ,
Found on Publication Page
297
Sherovers emphasis on futurity as the sine qua non of moral personality follows both Kant and Heideggers focus on elucidating the essential possibilities of human thinking and experiencing . Sherover , however , picks up where Kant and Heidegger left offshifting Kants focus on things to a focus on persons , and moving beyond Heideggers focus on the structure of experiential time toward an understanding of time as experienced . For Sherover , then , a primacy of the future perspective means taking seriously the primacy of persons and facing , in that respect , the question of the ontological meaning of possibility-as-such -LRB- HKT ,
Found on Publication Page
296
Sherovers emphasis on futurity as the sine qua non of moral personality follows both Kant and Heideggers focus on elucidating the essential possibilities of human thinking and experiencing . Sherover , however , picks up where Kant and Heidegger left offshifting Kants focus on things to a focus on persons , and moving beyond Heideggers focus on the structure of experiential time toward an understanding of time as experienced . For Sherover , then , a primacy of the future perspective means taking seriously the primacy of persons and facing , in that respect , the question of the ontological meaning of possibility-as-such -LRB- HKT ,
Found on Publication Page
295
Sherovers emphasis on futurity as the sine qua non of moral personality follows both Kant and Heideggers focus on elucidating the essential possibilities of human thinking and experiencing . Sherover , however , picks up where Kant and Heidegger left offshifting Kants focus on things to a focus on persons , and moving beyond Heideggers focus on the structure of experiential time toward an understanding of time as experienced . For Sherover , then , a primacy of the future perspective means taking seriously the primacy of persons and facing , in that respect , the question of the ontological meaning of possibility-as-such -LRB- HKT ,
Found on Publication Page
294
Sherovers emphasis on futurity as the sine qua non of moral personality follows both Kant and Heideggers focus on elucidating the essential possibilities of human thinking and experiencing . Sherover , however , picks up where Kant and Heidegger left offshifting Kants focus on things to a focus on persons , and moving beyond Heideggers focus on the structure of experiential time toward an understanding of time as experienced . For Sherover , then , a primacy of the future perspective means taking seriously the primacy of persons and facing , in that respect , the question of the ontological meaning of possibility-as-such -LRB- HKT ,
Found on Publication Page
293
Sherovers emphasis on futurity as the sine qua non of moral personality follows both Kant and Heideggers focus on elucidating the essential possibilities of human thinking and experiencing . Sherover , however , picks up where Kant and Heidegger left offshifting Kants focus on things to a focus on persons , and moving beyond Heideggers focus on the structure of experiential time toward an understanding of time as experienced . For Sherover , then , a primacy of the future perspective means taking seriously the primacy of persons and facing , in that respect , the question of the ontological meaning of possibility-as-such -LRB- HKT ,
Found on Publication Page
292
Sherovers emphasis on futurity as the sine qua non of moral personality follows both Kant and Heideggers focus on elucidating the essential possibilities of human thinking and experiencing . Sherover , however , picks up where Kant and Heidegger left offshifting Kants focus on things to a focus on persons , and moving beyond Heideggers focus on the structure of experiential time toward an understanding of time as experienced . For Sherover , then , a primacy of the future perspective means taking seriously the primacy of persons and facing , in that respect , the question of the ontological meaning of possibility-as-such -LRB- HKT ,
Found on Publication Page
291
Sherovers emphasis on futurity as the sine qua non of moral personality follows both Kant and Heideggers focus on elucidating the essential possibilities of human thinking and experiencing . Sherover , however , picks up where Kant and Heidegger left offshifting Kants focus on things to a focus on persons , and moving beyond Heideggers focus on the structure of experiential time toward an understanding of time as experienced . For Sherover , then , a primacy of the future perspective means taking seriously the primacy of persons and facing , in that respect , the question of the ontological meaning of possibility-as-such -LRB- HKT ,
Found on Publication Page
290
Sherovers emphasis on futurity as the sine qua non of moral personality follows both Kant and Heideggers focus on elucidating the essential possibilities of human thinking and experiencing . Sherover , however , picks up where Kant and Heidegger left offshifting Kants focus on things to a focus on persons , and moving beyond Heideggers focus on the structure of experiential time toward an understanding of time as experienced . For Sherover , then , a primacy of the future perspective means taking seriously the primacy of persons and facing , in that respect , the question of the ontological meaning of possibility-as-such -LRB- HKT ,
Found on Publication Page
289
Sherovers emphasis on futurity as the sine qua non of moral personality follows both Kant and Heideggers focus on elucidating the essential possibilities of human thinking and experiencing . Sherover , however , picks up where Kant and Heidegger left offshifting Kants focus on things to a focus on persons , and moving beyond Heideggers focus on the structure of experiential time toward an understanding of time as experienced . For Sherover , then , a primacy of the future perspective means taking seriously the primacy of persons and facing , in that respect , the question of the ontological meaning of possibility-as-such -LRB- HKT ,
Found on Publication Page
288
Sherovers emphasis on futurity as the sine qua non of moral personality follows both Kant and Heideggers focus on elucidating the essential possibilities of human thinking and experiencing . Sherover , however , picks up where Kant and Heidegger left offshifting Kants focus on things to a focus on persons , and moving beyond Heideggers focus on the structure of experiential time toward an understanding of time as experienced . For Sherover , then , a primacy of the future perspective means taking seriously the primacy of persons and facing , in that respect , the question of the ontological meaning of possibility-as-such -LRB- HKT ,
Found on Publication Page
287
Sherovers emphasis on futurity as the sine qua non of moral personality follows both Kant and Heideggers focus on elucidating the essential possibilities of human thinking and experiencing . Sherover , however , picks up where Kant and Heidegger left offshifting Kants focus on things to a focus on persons , and moving beyond Heideggers focus on the structure of experiential time toward an understanding of time as experienced . For Sherover , then , a primacy of the future perspective means taking seriously the primacy of persons and facing , in that respect , the question of the ontological meaning of possibility-as-such -LRB- HKT ,
Found on Publication Page
286
Sherovers emphasis on futurity as the sine qua non of moral personality follows both Kant and Heideggers focus on elucidating the essential possibilities of human thinking and experiencing . Sherover , however , picks up where Kant and Heidegger left offshifting Kants focus on things to a focus on persons , and moving beyond Heideggers focus on the structure of experiential time toward an understanding of time as experienced . For Sherover , then , a primacy of the future perspective means taking seriously the primacy of persons and facing , in that respect , the question of the ontological meaning of possibility-as-such -LRB- HKT ,
Found on Publication Page
285
Sherovers emphasis on futurity as the sine qua non of moral personality follows both Kant and Heideggers focus on elucidating the essential possibilities of human thinking and experiencing . Sherover , however , picks up where Kant and Heidegger left offshifting Kants focus on things to a focus on persons , and moving beyond Heideggers focus on the structure of experiential time toward an understanding of time as experienced . For Sherover , then , a primacy of the future perspective means taking seriously the primacy of persons and facing , in that respect , the question of the ontological meaning of possibility-as-such -LRB- HKT ,
Found on Publication Page
284
Sherovers emphasis on futurity as the sine qua non of moral personality follows both Kant and Heideggers focus on elucidating the essential possibilities of human thinking and experiencing . Sherover , however , picks up where Kant and Heidegger left offshifting Kants focus on things to a focus on persons , and moving beyond Heideggers focus on the structure of experiential time toward an understanding of time as experienced . For Sherover , then , a primacy of the future perspective means taking seriously the primacy of persons and facing , in that respect , the question of the ontological meaning of possibility-as-such -LRB- HKT ,
Found on Publication Page
283
Sherovers emphasis on futurity as the sine qua non of moral personality follows both Kant and Heideggers focus on elucidating the essential possibilities of human thinking and experiencing . Sherover , however , picks up where Kant and Heidegger left offshifting Kants focus on things to a focus on persons , and moving beyond Heideggers focus on the structure of experiential time toward an understanding of time as experienced . For Sherover , then , a primacy of the future perspective means taking seriously the primacy of persons and facing , in that respect , the question of the ontological meaning of possibility-as-such -LRB- HKT ,
Found on Publication Page
282
Sherovers emphasis on futurity as the sine qua non of moral personality follows both Kant and Heideggers focus on elucidating the essential possibilities of human thinking and experiencing . Sherover , however , picks up where Kant and Heidegger left offshifting Kants focus on things to a focus on persons , and moving beyond Heideggers focus on the structure of experiential time toward an understanding of time as experienced . For Sherover , then , a primacy of the future perspective means taking seriously the primacy of persons and facing , in that respect , the question of the ontological meaning of possibility-as-such -LRB- HKT ,
Found on Publication Page
281
Sherovers emphasis on futurity as the sine qua non of moral personality follows both Kant and Heideggers focus on elucidating the essential possibilities of human thinking and experiencing . Sherover , however , picks up where Kant and Heidegger left offshifting Kants focus on things to a focus on persons , and moving beyond Heideggers focus on the structure of experiential time toward an understanding of time as experienced . For Sherover , then , a primacy of the future perspective means taking seriously the primacy of persons and facing , in that respect , the question of the ontological meaning of possibility-as-such -LRB- HKT ,
Found on Publication Page
280
Sherovers emphasis on futurity as the sine qua non of moral personality follows both Kant and Heideggers focus on elucidating the essential possibilities of human thinking and experiencing . Sherover , however , picks up where Kant and Heidegger left offshifting Kants focus on things to a focus on persons , and moving beyond Heideggers focus on the structure of experiential time toward an understanding of time as experienced . For Sherover , then , a primacy of the future perspective means taking seriously the primacy of persons and facing , in that respect , the question of the ontological meaning of possibility-as-such -LRB- HKT ,
Found on Publication Page
Unspecified
259
Argues that Cheney's postmodern approach to environmental ethics neglects to include non-human animals in its considerations. Offered is an extension of Cheney's approach that takes seriously the construction of ethical standards for nha in environmental theory.
Found on Publication Page
256
Response essay to Rob Boddice's article, The Moral Status of Animals and the Historical Human Cache. I argue that Boddice's conservative call to avoid advocacy in scholarship because of rhetorical inconsistencies in the past is an overreach that harms rather than helps non-human animal advocates. I offer a process philosophy framework that can help nha advocates ground advocacy in fruitful ways, even if past rhetoric was inconsistent.
Found on Publication Page
255
Queering the (sacred) body politic: Considering the performative cultural politics of The Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence
Found on Publication Page
253
Response essay to Rob Boddice's article, The Moral Status of Animals and the Historical Human Cache. I argue that Boddice's conservative call to avoid advocacy in scholarship because of rhetorical inconsistencies in the past is an overreach that harms rather than helps non-human animal advocates. I offer a process philosophy framework that can help nha advocates ground advocacy in fruitful ways, even if past rhetoric was inconsistent.
Found on Publication Page
252
Queering the (Sacred) Body Politic: Considering the Performative Cultural Politics of The Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence
Found on Publication Page
251
Editor (and co-founder), Kaleidoscope: A Graduate Journal of Qualitiative Communication Research Southern Illinois University
Found on Publication Page
250
Response essay to Rob Boddice's article, The Moral Status of Animals and the Historical Human Cache. I argue that Boddice's conservative call to avoid advocacy in scholarship because of rhetorical inconsistencies in the past is an overreach that harms rather than helps non-human animal advocates. I offer a process philosophy framework that can help nha advocates ground advocacy in fruitful ways, even if past rhetoric was inconsistent.
Found on Publication Page
249
Queering the (sacred) body politic: Considering the performative cultural politics of The Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence
Found on Publication Page
248
Editor (and co-founder), Kaleidoscope: A Graduate Journal of Qualitiative Communication Research Southern Illinois University
Found on Publication Page
247
Response essay to Rob Boddice's article, The Moral Status of Animals and the Historical Human Cache. I argue that Boddice's conservative call to avoid advocacy in scholarship because of rhetorical inconsistencies in the past is an overreach that harms rather than helps non-human animal advocates. I offer a process philosophy framework that can help nha advocates ground advocacy in fruitful ways, even if past rhetoric was inconsistent.
Found on Publication Page
246
Queering the (Sacred) Body Politic: Considering the Performative Cultural Politics of The Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence
Found on Publication Page
245
Argues for the possibility of moving beyond the human-centric center-margin binary so often found in critical scholarship. Instead, a post-critical move would expand the frame to include non-human animals while also recognizing the human species as oppressor in this framework.
Found on Publication Page
244
Editor (and co-founder), Kaleidoscope: A Graduate Journal of Qualitiative Communication Research Southern Illinois University
Found on Publication Page
243
Response essay to Rob Boddice's article, The Moral Status of Animals and the Historical Human Cache. I argue that Boddice's conservative call to avoid advocacy in scholarship because of rhetorical inconsistencies in the past is an overreach that harms rather than helps non-human animal advocates. I offer a process philosophy framework that can help nha advocates ground advocacy in fruitful ways, even if past rhetoric was inconsistent.
Found on Publication Page
242
Queering the (sacred) body politic: Considering the performative cultural politics of The Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence
Found on Publication Page
241
Argues for the possibility of moving beyond the human-centric center-margin binary so often found in critical scholarship. Instead, a post-critical move would expand the frame to include non-human animals while also recognizing the human species as oppressor in this framework.
Found on Publication Page
240
Situates environmental activism within a process philosophy framework and argues that charges of "radicalism" in some environmental activism is misplaced.
Found on Publication Page
238
Queering the (Sacred) Body Politic: Considering the Performative Cultural Politics of The Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence
Found on Publication Page
237
Argues for the possibility of moving beyond the human-centric center-margin binary so often found in critical scholarship. Instead, a post-critical move would expand the frame to include non-human animals while also recognizing the human species as oppressor in this framework.
Found on Publication Page
236
Situates environmental activism within a process philosophy framework and argues that charges of "radicalism" in some environmental activism is misplaced.
Found on Publication Page
234
Queering the (sacred) body politic: Considering the performative cultural politics of The Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence
Found on Publication Page
233
Argues for the possibility of moving beyond the human-centric center-margin binary so often found in critical scholarship. Instead, a post-critical move would expand the frame to include non-human animals while also recognizing the human species as oppressor in this framework.
Found on Publication Page
232
Situates environmental activism within a process philosophy framework and argues that charges of "radicalism" in some environmental activism is misplaced.
Found on Publication Page
231
Queering the (Sacred) Body Politic: Considering the Performative Cultural Politics of The Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence
Found on Publication Page
230
Situates environmental activism within a process philosophy framework and argues that charges of "radicalism" in some environmental activism is misplaced.
Found on Publication Page
229
Queering the (sacred) body politic: Considering the performative cultural politics of The Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence
Found on Publication Page
228
Situates environmental activism within a process philosophy framework and argues that charges of "radicalism" in some environmental activism is misplaced.
Found on Publication Page
227
Queering the (Sacred) Body Politic: Considering the Performative Cultural Politics of The Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence
Found on Publication Page
226
Situates environmental activism within a process philosophy framework and argues that charges of "radicalism" in some environmental activism is misplaced.
Found on Publication Page
225
Situates environmental activism within a process philosophy framework and argues that charges of "radicalism" in some environmental activism is misplaced.
Found on Publication Page
224
Argues for the possibility of moving beyond the human-centric center-margin binary so often found in critical scholarship. Instead, a post-critical move would expand the frame to include non-human animals while also recognizing the human species as oppressor in this framework.
Found on Publication Page
223
Argues for the possibility of moving beyond the human-centric center-margin binary so often found in critical scholarship. Instead, a post-critical move would expand the frame to include non-human animals while also recognizing the human species as oppressor in this framework.
Found on Publication Page
222
Personalist Ethics, Consistency, and Human Freedom in Community: Vegetarianism as Moral Leadership
Found on Publication Page
221
Argues that Cheney's postmodern approach to environmental ethics neglects to include non-human animals in its considerations. Offered is an extension of Cheney's approach that takes seriously the construction of ethical standards for nha in environmental theory.
Found on Publication Page
220
Response essay to Rob Boddice's article, The Moral Status of Animals and the Historical Human Cache. I argue that Boddice's conservative call to avoid advocacy in scholarship because of rhetorical inconsistencies in the past is an overreach that harms rather than helps non-human animal advocates. I offer a process philosophy framework that can help nha advocates ground advocacy in fruitful ways, even if past rhetoric was inconsistent.
Found on Publication Page
219
Response essay to Rob Boddice's article, The Moral Status of Animals and the Historical Human Cache. I argue that Boddice's conservative call to avoid advocacy in scholarship because of rhetorical inconsistencies in the past is an overreach that harms rather than helps non-human animal advocates. I offer a process philosophy framework that can help nha advocates ground advocacy in fruitful ways, even if past rhetoric was inconsistent.
Found on Publication Page
218
Response essay to Rob Boddice's article, The Moral Status of Animals and the Historical Human Cache. I argue that Boddice's conservative call to avoid advocacy in scholarship because of rhetorical inconsistencies in the past is an overreach that harms rather than helps non-human animal advocates. I offer a process philosophy framework that can help nha advocates ground advocacy in fruitful ways, even if past rhetoric was inconsistent.
Found on Publication Page
217
Critical Consciousness and Pedagogy: Reconceptualizing Student Centered Dialogue as Educational Practice
Found on Publication Page
216
Argues for the possibility of moving beyond the human-centric center-margin binary so often found in critical scholarship. Instead, a post-critical move would expand the frame to include non-human animals while also recognizing the human species as oppressor in this framework.
Found on Publication Page
215
Argues that Cheney's postmodern approach to environmental ethics neglects to include non-human animals in its considerations. Offered is an extension of Cheney's approach that takes seriously the construction of ethical standards for nha in environmental theory.
Found on Publication Page
214
Argues that Cheney's postmodern approach to environmental ethics neglects to include non-human animals in its considerations. Offered is an extension of Cheney's approach that takes seriously the construction of ethical standards for nha in environmental theory.
Found on Publication Page
213
Earlier, more in-depth article version (with images) of chapter published in Sexual Identities and Communication in Everyday Life: A Reader
Found on Publication Page
212
Response essay to Rob Boddice's article, The Moral Status of Animals and the Historical Human Cache. I argue that Boddice's conservative call to avoid advocacy in scholarship because of rhetorical inconsistencies in the past is an overreach that harms rather than helps non-human animal advocates. I offer a process philosophy framework that can help nha advocates ground advocacy in fruitful ways, even if past rhetoric was inconsistent.
Found on Publication Page
211
Earlier, more in-depth article version (with images) of chapter published in Sexual Identities and Communication in Everyday Life: A Reader
Found on Publication Page
210
Argues for the possibility of moving beyond the human-centric center-margin binary so often found in critical scholarship. Instead, a post-critical move would expand the frame to include non-human animals while also recognizing the human species as oppressor in this framework.
Found on Publication Page
209
Earlier, more in-depth article version (with images) of chapter published in Sexual Identities and Communication in Everyday Life: A Reader
Found on Publication Page
208
Argues that Cheney's postmodern approach to environmental ethics neglects to include non-human animals in its considerations. Offered is an extension of Cheney's approach that takes seriously the construction of ethical standards for nha in environmental theory.
Found on Publication Page
207
In K.E. Lovaas and M.M. Jenkins (Eds.) _Sexual Identities and Communication in Everyday Life: A Reader_ (247-262). London: Sage Publications
Found on Publication Page
206
Response essay to Rob Boddice's article, The Moral Status of Animals and the Historical Human Cache. I argue that Boddice's conservative call to avoid advocacy in scholarship because of rhetorical inconsistencies in the past is an overreach that harms rather than helps non-human animal advocates. I offer a process philosophy framework that can help nha advocates ground advocacy in fruitful ways, even if past rhetoric was inconsistent.
Found on Publication Page
205
Earlier, more in-depth article version (with images) of chapter published in Sexual Identities and Communication in Everyday Life: A Reader
Found on Publication Page
204
Argues for the possibility of moving beyond the human-centric center-margin binary so often found in critical scholarship. Instead, a post-critical move would expand the frame to include non-human animals while also recognizing the human species as oppressor in this framework.
Found on Publication Page
203
In K.E. Lovaas and M.M. Jenkins (Eds.) _Sexual Identities and Communication in Everyday Life: A Reader_ (247-262). London: Sage Publications
Found on Publication Page
202
Argues that Cheney's postmodern approach to environmental ethics neglects to include non-human animals in its considerations. Offered is an extension of Cheney's approach that takes seriously the construction of ethical standards for nha in environmental theory.
Found on Publication Page
201
In K.E. Lovaas and M.M. Jenkins (Eds.) _Sexual Identities and Communication in Everyday Life: A Reader_ (247-262). London: Sage Publications
Found on Publication Page
200
Response essay to Rob Boddice's article, The Moral Status of Animals and the Historical Human Cache. I argue that Boddice's conservative call to avoid advocacy in scholarship because of rhetorical inconsistencies in the past is an overreach that harms rather than helps non-human animal advocates. I offer a process philosophy framework that can help nha advocates ground advocacy in fruitful ways, even if past rhetoric was inconsistent.
Found on Publication Page
199
In K.E. Lovaas and M.M. Jenkins (Eds.) _Sexual Identities and Communication in Everyday Life: A Reader_ (247-262). London: Sage Publications
Found on Publication Page
198
Argues for the possibility of moving beyond the human-centric center-margin binary so often found in critical scholarship. Instead, a post-critical move would expand the frame to include non-human animals while also recognizing the human species as oppressor in this framework.
Found on Publication Page
197
Earlier, more in-depth article version (with images) of chapter published in Sexual Identities and Communication in Everyday Life: A Reader
Found on Publication Page
196
Argues that Cheney's postmodern approach to environmental ethics neglects to include non-human animals in its considerations. Offered is an extension of Cheney's approach that takes seriously the construction of ethical standards for nha in environmental theory.
Found on Publication Page
195
In K.E. Lovaas and M.M. Jenkins (Eds.) _Sexual Identities and Communication in Everyday Life: A Reader_ (247-262). London: Sage Publications
Found on Publication Page
194
Response essay to Rob Boddice's article, The Moral Status of Animals and the Historical Human Cache. I argue that Boddice's conservative call to avoid advocacy in scholarship because of rhetorical inconsistencies in the past is an overreach that harms rather than helps non-human animal advocates. I offer a process philosophy framework that can help nha advocates ground advocacy in fruitful ways, even if past rhetoric was inconsistent.
Found on Publication Page
193
In K.E. Lovaas and M.M. Jenkins (Eds.) _Sexual Identities and Communication in Everyday Life: A Reader_ (247-262). London: Sage Publications
Found on Publication Page
192
Argues for the possibility of moving beyond the human-centric center-margin binary so often found in critical scholarship. Instead, a post-critical move would expand the frame to include non-human animals while also recognizing the human species as oppressor in this framework.
Found on Publication Page
191
Earlier, more in-depth article version (with images) of chapter published in Sexual Identities and Communication in Everyday Life: A Reader
Found on Publication Page
190
Argues that Cheney's postmodern approach to environmental ethics neglects to include non-human animals in its considerations. Offered is an extension of Cheney's approach that takes seriously the construction of ethical standards for nha in environmental theory.
Found on Publication Page
189
Earlier, more in-depth article version (with images) of chapter published in Sexual Identities and Communication in Everyday Life: A Reader
Found on Publication Page
187
In K.E. Lovaas and M.M. Jenkins (Eds.) _Sexual Identities and Communication in Everyday Life: A Reader_ (247-262). London: Sage Publications
Found on Publication Page
186
Response essay to Rob Boddice's article, The Moral Status of Animals and the Historical Human Cache. I argue that Boddice's conservative call to avoid advocacy in scholarship because of rhetorical inconsistencies in the past is an overreach that harms rather than helps non-human animal advocates. I offer a process philosophy framework that can help nha advocates ground advocacy in fruitful ways, even if past rhetoric was inconsistent.
Found on Publication Page
185
In K.E. Lovaas and M.M. Jenkins (Eds.) _Sexual Identities and Communication in Everyday Life: A Reader_ (247-262). London: Sage Publications
Found on Publication Page
181
Situates environmental activism within a process philosophy framework and argues that charges of "radicalism" in some environmental activism is misplaced.
Found on Publication Page
179
Response essay to Rob Boddice's article, The Moral Status of Animals and the Historical Human Cache. I argue that Boddice's conservative call to avoid advocacy in scholarship because of rhetorical inconsistencies in the past is an overreach that harms rather than helps non-human animal advocates. I offer a process philosophy framework that can help nha advocates ground advocacy in fruitful ways, even if past rhetoric was inconsistent.
Found on Publication Page
178
Describes and discusses language use, ethics, and cruel factory farm industry practices. Concludes by arguing for language changes and non-use of factory farm industry products.
Found on Publication Page
177
Situates environmental activism within a process philosophy framework and argues that charges of "radicalism" in some environmental activism is misplaced.
Found on Publication Page
176
Describes and discusses language use, ethics, and cruel factory farm industry practices. Concludes by arguing for language changes and non-use of factory farm industry products.
Found on Publication Page
175
Response essay to Rob Boddice's article, The Moral Status of Animals and the Historical Human Cache. I argue that Boddice's conservative call to avoid advocacy in scholarship because of rhetorical inconsistencies in the past is an overreach that harms rather than helps non-human animal advocates. I offer a process philosophy framework that can help nha advocates ground advocacy in fruitful ways, even if past rhetoric was inconsistent.
Found on Publication Page
174
Describes and discusses language use, ethics, and cruel factory farm industry practices. Concludes by arguing for language changes and non-use of factory farm industry products.
Found on Publication Page
173
Situates environmental activism within a process philosophy framework and argues that charges of "radicalism" in some environmental activism is misplaced.
Found on Publication Page
172
Describes and discusses language use, ethics, and cruel factory farm industry practices. Concludes by arguing for language changes and non-use of factory farm industry products.
Found on Publication Page
171
Response essay to Rob Boddice's article, The Moral Status of Animals and the Historical Human Cache. I argue that Boddice's conservative call to avoid advocacy in scholarship because of rhetorical inconsistencies in the past is an overreach that harms rather than helps non-human animal advocates. I offer a process philosophy framework that can help nha advocates ground advocacy in fruitful ways, even if past rhetoric was inconsistent.
Found on Publication Page
170
Describes and discusses language use, ethics, and cruel factory farm industry practices. Concludes by arguing for language changes and non-use of factory farm industry products.
Found on Publication Page
169
Situates environmental activism within a process philosophy framework and argues that charges of "radicalism" in some environmental activism is misplaced.
Found on Publication Page
168
Describes and discusses language use, ethics, and cruel factory farm industry practices. Concludes by arguing for language changes and non-use of factory farm industry products.
Found on Publication Page
165
Response essay to Rob Boddice's article, The Moral Status of Animals and the Historical Human Cache. I argue that Boddice's conservative call to avoid advocacy in scholarship because of rhetorical inconsistencies in the past is an overreach that harms rather than helps non-human animal advocates. I offer a process philosophy framework that can help nha advocates ground advocacy in fruitful ways, even if past rhetoric was inconsistent.
Found on Publication Page
163
Critical Consciousness and Pedagogy: Reconceptualizing Student Centered Dialogue as Educational Practice
Found on Publication Page
162
Situates environmental activism within a process philosophy framework and argues that charges of "radicalism" in some environmental activism is misplaced.
Found on Publication Page
161
Critical Consciousness and Pedagogy: Reconceptualizing Student Centered Dialogue as Educational Practice
Found on Publication Page
159
Critical Consciousness and Pedagogy: Reconceptualizing Student Centered Dialogue as Educational Practice
Found on Publication Page
158
Empedocles: European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication, 4:2
Found on Publication Text
157
Response essay to Rob Boddice's article, The Moral Status of Animals and the Historical Human Cache. I argue that Boddice's conservative call to avoid advocacy in scholarship because of rhetorical inconsistencies in the past is an overreach that harms rather than helps non-human animal advocates. I offer a process philosophy framework that can help nha advocates ground advocacy in fruitful ways, even if past rhetoric was inconsistent.
Found on Publication Page
156
Critical Consciousness and Pedagogy: Reconceptualizing Student Centered Dialogue as Educational Practice
Found on Publication Page
155
Situates environmental activism within a process philosophy framework and argues that charges of "radicalism" in some environmental activism is misplaced.
Found on Publication Page
151
Response essay to Rob Boddice's article, The Moral Status of Animals and the Historical Human Cache. I argue that Boddice's conservative call to avoid advocacy in scholarship because of rhetorical inconsistencies in the past is an overreach that harms rather than helps non-human animal advocates. I offer a process philosophy framework that can help nha advocates ground advocacy in fruitful ways, even if past rhetoric was inconsistent.
Found on Publication Page
149
Situates environmental activism within a process philosophy framework and argues that charges of "radicalism" in some environmental activism is misplaced.
Found on Publication Page
147
Response essay to Rob Boddice's article, The Moral Status of Animals and the Historical Human Cache. I argue that Boddice's conservative call to avoid advocacy in scholarship because of rhetorical inconsistencies in the past is an overreach that harms rather than helps non-human animal advocates. I offer a process philosophy framework that can help nha advocates ground advocacy in fruitful ways, even if past rhetoric was inconsistent.
Found on Publication Page
146
Argues that Cheney's postmodern approach to environmental ethics neglects to include non-human animals in its considerations. Offered is an extension of Cheney's approach that takes seriously the construction of ethical standards for nha in environmental theory.
Found on Publication Page
137
Argues for the possibility of moving beyond the human-centric center-margin binary so often found in critical scholarship. Instead, a post-critical move would expand the frame to include non-human animals while also recognizing the human species as oppressor in this framework.
Found on Publication Page
136
Argues for the possibility of moving beyond the human-centric center-margin binary so often found in critical scholarship. Instead, a post-critical move would expand the frame to include non-human animals while also recognizing the human species as oppressor in this framework.
Found on Publication Page
132
Earlier, more in-depth article version (with images) of chapter published in Sexual Identities and Communication in Everyday Life: A Reader
Found on Publication Page
130
Argues for the possibility of moving beyond the human-centric center-margin binary so often found in critical scholarship. Instead, a post-critical move would expand the frame to include non-human animals while also recognizing the human species as oppressor in this framework.
Found on Publication Page
128
Argues for the possibility of moving beyond the human-centric center-margin binary so often found in critical scholarship. Instead, a post-critical move would expand the frame to include non-human animals while also recognizing the human species as oppressor in this framework.
Found on Publication Page
123
Response essay to Rob Boddice's article, The Moral Status of Animals and the Historical Human Cache. I argue that Boddice's conservative call to avoid advocacy in scholarship because of rhetorical inconsistencies in the past is an overreach that harms rather than helps non-human animal advocates. I offer a process philosophy framework that can help nha advocates ground advocacy in fruitful ways, even if past rhetoric was inconsistent.
Found on Publication Page
122
Earlier, more in-depth article version (with images) of chapter published in Sexual Identities and Communication in Everyday Life: A Reader
Found on Publication Page
121
Argues for the possibility of moving beyond the human-centric center-margin binary so often found in critical scholarship. Instead, a post-critical move would expand the frame to include non-human animals while also recognizing the human species as oppressor in this framework.
Found on Publication Page
120
Response essay to Rob Boddice's article, The Moral Status of Animals and the Historical Human Cache. I argue that Boddice's conservative call to avoid advocacy in scholarship because of rhetorical inconsistencies in the past is an overreach that harms rather than helps non-human animal advocates. I offer a process philosophy framework that can help nha advocates ground advocacy in fruitful ways, even if past rhetoric was inconsistent.
Found on Publication Page
119
In K.E. Lovaas and M.M. Jenkins (Eds.) _Sexual Identities and Communication in Everyday Life: A Reader_ (247-262). London: Sage Publications
Found on Publication Page
118
Response essay to Rob Boddice's article, The Moral Status of Animals and the Historical Human Cache. I argue that Boddice's conservative call to avoid advocacy in scholarship because of rhetorical inconsistencies in the past is an overreach that harms rather than helps non-human animal advocates. I offer a process philosophy framework that can help nha advocates ground advocacy in fruitful ways, even if past rhetoric was inconsistent.
Found on Publication Page
117
In K.E. Lovaas and M.M. Jenkins (Eds.) _Sexual Identities and Communication in Everyday Life: A Reader_ (247-262). London: Sage Publications
Found on Publication Page
116
Earlier, more in-depth article version (with images) of chapter published in Sexual Identities and Communication in Everyday Life: A Reader
Found on Publication Page
115
In K.E. Lovaas and M.M. Jenkins (Eds.) _Sexual Identities and Communication in Everyday Life: A Reader_ (247-262). London: Sage Publications
Found on Publication Page
114
Earlier, more in-depth article version (with images) of chapter published in Sexual Identities and Communication in Everyday Life: A Reader
Found on Publication Page
113
Earlier, more in-depth article version (with images) of chapter published in Sexual Identities and Communication in Everyday Life: A Reader
Found on Publication Page
112
In K.E. Lovaas and M.M. Jenkins (Eds.) _Sexual Identities and Communication in Everyday Life: A Reader_ (247-262). London: Sage Publications
Found on Publication Page
111
In K.E. Lovaas and M.M. Jenkins (Eds.) _Sexual Identities and Communication in Everyday Life: A Reader_ (247-262). London: Sage Publications
Found on Publication Page
110
In K.E. Lovaas and M.M. Jenkins (Eds.) _Sexual Identities and Communication in Everyday Life: A Reader_ (247-262). London: Sage Publications
Found on Publication Page
109
Earlier, more in-depth article version (with images) of chapter published in Sexual Identities and Communication in Everyday Life: A Reader
Found on Publication Page
108
In K.E. Lovaas and M.M. Jenkins (Eds.) _Sexual Identities and Communication in Everyday Life: A Reader_ (247-262). London: Sage Publications
Found on Publication Page
107
In K.E. Lovaas and M.M. Jenkins (Eds.) _Sexual Identities and Communication in Everyday Life: A Reader_ (247-262). London: Sage Publications
Found on Publication Page
106
Earlier, more in-depth article version (with images) of chapter published in Sexual Identities and Communication in Everyday Life: A Reader
Found on Publication Page
102
Argues that Cheney's postmodern approach to environmental ethics neglects to include non-human animals in its considerations. Offered is an extension of Cheney's approach that takes seriously the construction of ethical standards for nha in environmental theory.
Found on Publication Page
98
Argues that Cheney's postmodern approach to environmental ethics neglects to include non-human animals in its considerations. Offered is an extension of Cheney's approach that takes seriously the construction of ethical standards for nha in environmental theory.
Found on Publication Page
96
Response essay to Rob Boddice's article, The Moral Status of Animals and the Historical Human Cache. I argue that Boddice's conservative call to avoid advocacy in scholarship because of rhetorical inconsistencies in the past is an overreach that harms rather than helps non-human animal advocates. I offer a process philosophy framework that can help nha advocates ground advocacy in fruitful ways, even if past rhetoric was inconsistent.
Found on Publication Page
95
Describes and discusses language use, ethics, and cruel factory farm industry practices. Concludes by arguing for language changes and non-use of factory farm industry products.
Found on Publication Page
93
Response essay to Rob Boddice's article, The Moral Status of Animals and the Historical Human Cache. I argue that Boddice's conservative call to avoid advocacy in scholarship because of rhetorical inconsistencies in the past is an overreach that harms rather than helps non-human animal advocates. I offer a process philosophy framework that can help nha advocates ground advocacy in fruitful ways, even if past rhetoric was inconsistent.
Found on Publication Page
91
Queering the (sacred) body politic: Considering the performative cultural politics of The Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence
Found on Publication Page
89
Queering the (sacred) body politic: Considering the performative cultural politics of The Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence
Found on Publication Page
88
Describes and discusses language use, ethics, and cruel factory farm industry practices. Concludes by arguing for language changes and non-use of factory farm industry products.
Found on Publication Page
87
Personalist Ethics, Consistency, and Human Freedom in Community: Vegetarianism as Moral Leadership
Found on Publication Page
86
Queering the (Sacred) Body Politic: Considering the Performative Cultural Politics of The Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence
Found on Publication Page
85
Personalist Ethics, Consistency, and Human Freedom in Community: Vegetarianism as Moral Leadership
Found on Publication Page
84
Queering the (Sacred) Body Politic: Considering the Performative Cultural Politics of The Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence
Found on Publication Page
82
Personalist Ethics, Consistency, and Human Freedom in Community: Vegetarianism as Moral Leadership
Found on Publication Page
81
Queering the (sacred) body politic: Considering the performative cultural politics of The Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence
Found on Publication Page
80
Queering the (sacred) body politic: Considering the performative cultural politics of The Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence
Found on Publication Page
79
Queering the (Sacred) Body Politic: Considering the Performative Cultural Politics of The Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence
Found on Publication Page
77
Queering the (Sacred) Body Politic: Considering the Performative Cultural Politics of The Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence
Found on Publication Page
76
Queering the (Sacred) Body Politic: Considering the Performative Cultural Politics of The Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence
Found on Publication Page
75
Queering the (sacred) body politic: Considering the performative cultural politics of The Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence
Found on Publication Page
74
Whiteheads Speculative Philosophy of Organism: Process Metaphysical Reflections on/in Radical Environmental Activism
Found on Publication Page
73
Whiteheads Speculative Philosophy of Organism: Process Metaphysical Reflections on/in Radical Environmental Activism
Found on Publication Page
72
Describes and discusses language use, ethics, and cruel factory farm industry practices. Concludes by arguing for language changes and non-use of factory farm industry products.
Found on Publication Page
71
Whiteheads Speculative Philosophy of Organism: Process Metaphysical Reflections on/in Radical Environmental Activism
Found on Publication Page
70
Whiteheads Speculative Philosophy of Organism: Process Metaphysical Reflections on/in Radical Environmental Activism
Found on Publication Page
69
Whiteheads Speculative Philosophy of Organism: Process Metaphysical Reflections on/in Radical Environmental Activism
Found on Publication Page
68
Situates environmental activism within a process philosophy framework and argues that charges of "radicalism" in some environmental activism is misplaced.
Found on Publication Page
67
Situates environmental activism within a process philosophy framework and argues that charges of "radicalism" in some environmental activism is misplaced.
Found on Publication Page
66
Situates environmental activism within a process philosophy framework and argues that charges of "radicalism" in some environmental activism is misplaced.
Found on Publication Page
65
Whiteheads Speculative Philosophy of Organism: Process Metaphysical Reflections on/in Radical Environmental Activism
Found on Publication Page
63
Situates environmental activism within a process philosophy framework and argues that charges of "radicalism" in some environmental activism is misplaced.
Found on Publication Page
61
Situates environmental activism within a process philosophy framework and argues that charges of "radicalism" in some environmental activism is misplaced.
Found on Publication Page
59
Whiteheads Speculative Philosophy of Organism: Process Metaphysical Reflections on/in Radical Environmental Activism
Found on Publication Page
58
Whiteheads Speculative Philosophy of Organism: Process Metaphysical Reflections on/in Radical Environmental Activism
Found on Publication Page
57
Situates environmental activism within a process philosophy framework and argues that charges of "radicalism" in some environmental activism is misplaced.
Found on Publication Page
56
Whiteheads Speculative Philosophy of Organism: Process Metaphysical Reflections on/in Radical Environmental Activism
Found on Publication Page
55
Whiteheads Speculative Philosophy of Organism: Process Metaphysical Reflections on/in Radical Environmental Activism
Found on Publication Page
54
Personalist Ethics, Consistency, and Human Freedom in Community: Vegetarianism as Moral Leadership
Found on Publication Page
53
Situates environmental activism within a process philosophy framework and argues that charges of "radicalism" in some environmental activism is misplaced.
Found on Publication Page
48
Response essay to Rob Boddice's article, The Moral Status of Animals and the Historical Human Cache. I argue that Boddice's conservative call to avoid advocacy in scholarship because of rhetorical inconsistencies in the past is an overreach that harms rather than helps non-human animal advocates. I offer a process philosophy framework that can help nha advocates ground advocacy in fruitful ways, even if past rhetoric was inconsistent.
Found on Publication Page
45
Argues for the possibility of moving beyond the human-centric center-margin binary so often found in critical scholarship. Instead, a post-critical move would expand the frame to include non-human animals while also recognizing the human species as oppressor in this framework.
Found on Publication Page
44
Argues for the possibility of moving beyond the human-centric center-margin binary so often found in critical scholarship. Instead, a post-critical move would expand the frame to include non-human animals while also recognizing the human species as oppressor in this framework.
Found on Publication Page
43
Argues for the possibility of moving beyond the human-centric center-margin binary so often found in critical scholarship. Instead, a post-critical move would expand the frame to include non-human animals while also recognizing the human species as oppressor in this framework.
Found on Publication Page
42
Argues for the possibility of moving beyond the human-centric center-margin binary so often found in critical scholarship. Instead, a post-critical move would expand the frame to include non-human animals while also recognizing the human species as oppressor in this framework.
Found on Publication Page
41
Argues for the possibility of moving beyond the human-centric center-margin binary so often found in critical scholarship. Instead, a post-critical move would expand the frame to include non-human animals while also recognizing the human species as oppressor in this framework.
Found on Publication Page
40
Describes and discusses language use, ethics, and cruel factory farm industry practices. Concludes by arguing for language changes and non-use of factory farm industry products.
Found on Publication Page
39
Describes and discusses language use, ethics, and cruel factory farm industry practices. Concludes by arguing for language changes and non-use of factory farm industry products.
Found on Publication Page
38
Describes and discusses language use, ethics, and cruel factory farm industry practices. Concludes by arguing for language changes and non-use of factory farm industry products.
Found on Publication Page
37
Describes and discusses language use, ethics, and cruel factory farm industry practices. Concludes by arguing for language changes and non-use of factory farm industry products.
Found on Publication Page
36
Describes and discusses language use, ethics, and cruel factory farm industry practices. Concludes by arguing for language changes and non-use of factory farm industry products.
Found on Publication Page
35
Response essay to Rob Boddice's article, The Moral Status of Animals and the Historical Human Cache. I argue that Boddice's conservative call to avoid advocacy in scholarship because of rhetorical inconsistencies in the past is an overreach that harms rather than helps non-human animal advocates. I offer a process philosophy framework that can help nha advocates ground advocacy in fruitful ways, even if past rhetoric was inconsistent.
Found on Publication Page
34
Response essay to Rob Boddice's article, The Moral Status of Animals and the Historical Human Cache. I argue that Boddice's conservative call to avoid advocacy in scholarship because of rhetorical inconsistencies in the past is an overreach that harms rather than helps non-human animal advocates. I offer a process philosophy framework that can help nha advocates ground advocacy in fruitful ways, even if past rhetoric was inconsistent.
Found on Publication Page
30
Response essay to Rob Boddice's article, The Moral Status of Animals and the Historical Human Cache. I argue that Boddice's conservative call to avoid advocacy in scholarship because of rhetorical inconsistencies in the past is an overreach that harms rather than helps non-human animal advocates. I offer a process philosophy framework that can help nha advocates ground advocacy in fruitful ways, even if past rhetoric was inconsistent.
Found on Publication Page
29
Response essay to Rob Boddice's article, The Moral Status of Animals and the Historical Human Cache. I argue that Boddice's conservative call to avoid advocacy in scholarship because of rhetorical inconsistencies in the past is an overreach that harms rather than helps non-human animal advocates. I offer a process philosophy framework that can help nha advocates ground advocacy in fruitful ways, even if past rhetoric was inconsistent.
Found on Publication Page
28
Response essay to Rob Boddice's article, The Moral Status of Animals and the Historical Human Cache. I argue that Boddice's conservative call to avoid advocacy in scholarship because of rhetorical inconsistencies in the past is an overreach that harms rather than helps non-human animal advocates. I offer a process philosophy framework that can help nha advocates ground advocacy in fruitful ways, even if past rhetoric was inconsistent.
Found on Publication Page
27
Response essay to Rob Boddice's article, The Moral Status of Animals and the Historical Human Cache. I argue that Boddice's conservative call to avoid advocacy in scholarship because of rhetorical inconsistencies in the past is an overreach that harms rather than helps non-human animal advocates. I offer a process philosophy framework that can help nha advocates ground advocacy in fruitful ways, even if past rhetoric was inconsistent.
Found on Publication Page
26
Response essay to Rob Boddice's article, The Moral Status of Animals and the Historical Human Cache. I argue that Boddice's conservative call to avoid advocacy in scholarship because of rhetorical inconsistencies in the past is an overreach that harms rather than helps non-human animal advocates. I offer a process philosophy framework that can help nha advocates ground advocacy in fruitful ways, even if past rhetoric was inconsistent.
Found on Publication Page
25
Argues that Cheney's postmodern approach to environmental ethics neglects to include non-human animals in its considerations. Offered is an extension of Cheney's approach that takes seriously the construction of ethical standards for nha in environmental theory.
Found on Publication Page
24
Response essay to Rob Boddice's article, The Moral Status of Animals and the Historical Human Cache. I argue that Boddice's conservative call to avoid advocacy in scholarship because of rhetorical inconsistencies in the past is an overreach that harms rather than helps non-human animal advocates. I offer a process philosophy framework that can help nha advocates ground advocacy in fruitful ways, even if past rhetoric was inconsistent.
Found on Publication Page
23
Response essay to Rob Boddice's article, The Moral Status of Animals and the Historical Human Cache. I argue that Boddice's conservative call to avoid advocacy in scholarship because of rhetorical inconsistencies in the past is an overreach that harms rather than helps non-human animal advocates. I offer a process philosophy framework that can help nha advocates ground advocacy in fruitful ways, even if past rhetoric was inconsistent.
Found on Publication Page
22
Argues for the possibility of moving beyond the human-centric center-margin binary so often found in critical scholarship. Instead, a post-critical move would expand the frame to include non-human animals while also recognizing the human species as oppressor in this framework.
Found on Publication Page
21
Argues for the possibility of moving beyond the human-centric center-margin binary so often found in critical scholarship. Instead, a post-critical move would expand the frame to include non-human animals while also recognizing the human species as oppressor in this framework.
Found on Publication Page
20
Argues for the possibility of moving beyond the human-centric center-margin binary so often found in critical scholarship. Instead, a post-critical move would expand the frame to include non-human animals while also recognizing the human species as oppressor in this framework.
Found on Publication Page
19
Argues for the possibility of moving beyond the human-centric center-margin binary so often found in critical scholarship. Instead, a post-critical move would expand the frame to include non-human animals while also recognizing the human species as oppressor in this framework.
Found on Publication Page
18
Argues for the possibility of moving beyond the human-centric center-margin binary so often found in critical scholarship. Instead, a post-critical move would expand the frame to include non-human animals while also recognizing the human species as oppressor in this framework.
Found on Publication Page
17
Argues for the possibility of moving beyond the human-centric center-margin binary so often found in critical scholarship. Instead, a post-critical move would expand the frame to include non-human animals while also recognizing the human species as oppressor in this framework.
Found on Publication Page
14
Argues that Cheney's postmodern approach to environmental ethics neglects to include non-human animals in its considerations. Offered is an extension of Cheney's approach that takes seriously the construction of ethical standards for nha in environmental theory.
Found on Publication Page
13
Argues for the possibility of moving beyond the human-centric center-margin binary so often found in critical scholarship. Instead, a post-critical move would expand the frame to include non-human animals while also recognizing the human species as oppressor in this framework.
Found on Publication Page
12
Argues that Cheney's postmodern approach to environmental ethics neglects to include non-human animals in its considerations. Offered is an extension of Cheney's approach that takes seriously the construction of ethical standards for nha in environmental theory.
Found on Publication Page
